Maria Navarro Oliva vs Alisa Danilova Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How does second serve performance impact predictions? In recent forms, Maria Navarro Oliva has an edge, winning 39.50% of points on her second serve compared to Alisa Danilova's 37.50%.
• Who performs better in return games? Alisa Danilova shines here, winning 55.52% of her opponent's second serve points, surpassing Maria Navarro Oliva who wins 50.89%.
• First serve return stats are also key: Danilova edges out with 34.01% over Navarro Oliva's 32.45%.
• Under pressure, Danilova has saved 51.52% of breakpoints, slightly more than Navarro Oliva's 50.60%, indicating a minor advantage in crucial moments on court.
• Last year's match win rate comparison shows little separation: Danilova's 57.14% closely matches Navarro Oliva's 57.50% success rate.
• Career surface preference differs: Danilova is strongest on clay with a 50% win rate, while Navarro Oliva's best is on indoor hard courts, also with a 50% win rate.
• Considering playing levels and winning rates: Navarro Oliva leads, with a 66.67% win rate in lower-tier tournaments, whereas Danilova records a 52.94% win rate in slightly higher-tier events.
• Victories against opponent quality reveal negligible difference, as Danilova faces opponents with an average rank of 281.68 versus Navarro Oliva's 282.63.
• If the match proceeds to a deciding set, Navarro Oliva holds a significant advantage, winning 44% of these situations compared to Danilova’s 20%.
• Break point conversion shows both are closely matched with 41.86% for Navarro Oliva and 41.76% for Danilova, suggesting no clear superiority here.

Editorial Prediction (November 19, 2025, UTC):

With Maria Navarro Oliva holding a slight edge in second serve points won, she has demonstrated stronger performance metrics in certain aspects compared to Alisa Danilova. These subtle differences could be pivotal over the match's duration.

Danilova's advantage in return games, particularly in second serve returns, highlights her potential to challenge Navarro Oliva's service strategy effectively. Nonetheless, Navarro Oliva's proficiency in converting matches that extend to a deciding set is a decisive factor leaning in her favor.

In analyzing various surface preferences and competitive levels navigated by both athletes, Navarro Oliva’s consistency at her preferred playing conditions and event levels may ultimately turn the table in her favor.

Given these insights and statistical comparisons, Maria Navarro Oliva emerges slightly ahead in this matchup, and she is projected to win the upcoming tennis match.